Like my dabblings with a different industry before it, I was surprised to find the affiliate marketing industry a ridiculously friendly arena. As a member of the UK’s biggest affiliate forum, it’s easy to see that affiliates big and small, merchants and networks all come together to share ideas, discuss projects and even self regulate problems that occur. It’s a fantastic thing to be part of and I love the fact that despite affiliates are all, essentially, in competition, they still come together and offer advice to others.
However, there has been one particular issue that has been discussed time and time again at the forums concerning one affiliate (who we will call Mr. A) who fails to even adhere to common courtesy. Mr A has a fantastic website; very well designed and extremely successful and for that they deserve hearty congratulations. However, he is using methods that are disrespectful to other affiliates by listing their URLs in the footer with statements that are belittling, amongst other things. These URLs don’t contain a hyperlink and used partially for the purposes of SEO in that anyone searching for a competitors URL may, in fact, land on Mr A’s site and be told that Mr As site is much better.
I’ve not really got involved with this discussion as I’m not in the position to, but my opinion is that I am disgusted at the lack of courtesy and ignorance to polite requests for the removal of these unfounded and disparaging statements. Mr A has a brilliant and successful website and is in no need whatsoever to use this, or any other unethical methods to get visitors to his site.
The trouble is, like I said earlier, affiliate marketing is not really regulated. Affiliates work hard, they share their knowledge and in the end, are careful not to break the rules that are in place or tread on each others’ toes. There is noone to stop Mr. A from breaking the rules, and the networks and merchants certainly won’t because they will lose a lot of money just to please what they might consider whining affiliates who are making less than Mr A.
But I was pleased to see one affiliate fighting back. This affiliate, Mr B, is also quite successful, but like many others, is irritated at the lack of action taken against Mr A and so has decided to belittle Mr As website on his own (new?) site. Hurrah! I love to see a vigilante in action.
So what does this mean? What does Mr B hope to achieve by, what one could call sinking to Mr A’s level? And will this trigger the start of other potentially childish attacks by affiliates who are all competing in the same sector, but irritated because Mr C is not playing by the rules?
I’m not putting down Mr B by any means; in fact I’m really pleased that someone has taken at least a small amount of action against Mr A. I’d also be interested to know if any interesting search results or other actions come from it. But I want to know what this means for the future of affiliate marketing. Will rule breaking become more common and what will happen to the rule breakers? Is this is a job for the new IAM Affiliate Marketing Council? I’m new to the game, so I’m interested to know your thoughts.
However, if you’re just confused by all the Mr As, Mr Bs and my nonsensical warbling then feel free to just ignore me!
Tags: Competitors, Future, Industry
Posted in Affiliate Stuff, Debate | 10 Comments »